Analyzing the Validity of Nadi Coordinates Using Astrology Software for Marital Predictions
Keywords:
Nadi koota, Ashtakoota, horoscope matching, ayanamsa, ephemeris, measurement reliability, marital predictionAbstract
In Ashtakoota horoscope matching, Nadi koota carries 8 of the 36 points, and a same-Nadi result (Nadi dosha) is often taken as a reason to turn down a marriage proposal. The verdict rests on a single computed value: the sidereal longitude of the Moon at each partner's birth, as returned by astrology software. This study asks whether that value is stable enough to support a marital prediction. We generated 20,000 birth instants between 1970 and 2005 at ten Indian cities. For each one we computed the Moon's longitude with two independent ephemeris engines, five ayanamsa conventions, geocentric and topocentric positions, and birth-time shifts of 5 to 60 minutes.
The two engines agreed to within 32 arcseconds and changed only 0.02% of Nadi assignments. Software conventions mattered far more. Moving from the Lahiri to the Raman ayanamsa changed the Nadi of 8.0% of individuals and reversed the Nadi dosha verdict for 9.9% of 10,000 simulated couples (Cohen's κ = 0.77). Topocentric correction changed 3.1% of Nadi assignments, about as many as a 60-minute error in birth time (3.0%). In a Monte Carlo analysis, verdict disagreement at this level reduced a true odds ratio of 2.0 to about 1.7 and lowered statistical power from 0.64 to 0.43 in a sample of 300 couples. A Nadi verdict therefore depends partly on how the software is set up. Any empirical test of Nadi-based marital prediction has to fix and report these settings before its outcome data can be read.
References
Astropy Collaboration. (2022). The Astropy Project: Sustaining and growing a community-oriented open-source project and the latest major release (v5.0) of the core package. The Astrophysical Journal, 935(2), 167. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74
Bross, I. (1954). Misclassification in 2 × 2 tables. Biometrics, 10(4), 478–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001619
Carlson, S. (1985). A double-blind test of astrology. Nature, 318(6045), 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/318419a0
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Dean, G., & Kelly, I. W. (2003). Is astrology relevant to consciousness and psi? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(6–7), 175–198.
Government of India. (1955). Report of the Calendar Reform Committee. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
LibEphemeris. (n.d.). Ayanamsha definitions and reference systems. Kerykeion. Retrieved October 6, 2026, from https://kerykeion.net/libephemeris/docs/reference/ayanamsha
Narlikar, J. V., Kunte, S., Dabholkar, N., & Kulkarni, P. (2009). A statistical test of astrology. Current Science, 96(5), 641–643.
Rhodes, B. C. (2011). PyEphem: Astronomical ephemeris for Python (Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1112.014).
Voas, D. (2007). Ten million marriages: A test of astrological "love signs". Centre for Census and Survey Research, University of Manchester.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kavya Setu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.